. . . Back to index.html
Ray, Roice and family.
It was nice seeing you all Thursday night. Here are a few of the objects we looked at.
The middle two photos (M51 and NGC7000) were taken Thursday for you to view on my
computer. They were saved to my hard drive. The top photo, also of M51, gives an
example of the benefits of stacking. The noise is much lower than the single M51
shot below it. The NGC700 photo below it is also noisy, but gives an idea of how
big some objects really are. If they were bright enough, they'd resemble small clouds.
The bottom photo includes M20 and M8 which we also saw on the computer Thursday,
although they didn't get saved. This photo is a composite of 18 frames, 9 from
Wednesday night, and 9 from a year ago.
All photos are the full field of view of the camera sensor, although they've been
reduced to 800 pixels high to fit the email. The sensor's field of view is
roughly 1.5 x 2 degrees or 3 moon/sun diameters by 4 moon/sun diameters.
Roice, I hope your young scientists can use them.
--
Hilton Long PO Box 1518 Parowan, UT 84761
M51 (Whirlpool Galaxy) Stack of 9. Shot 5/11/16 ISO 1600 @ 240 seconds.
Color saturation is enhanced, but hue is unchanged. I counted 8 galaxies in this photo.
M51 (Whirlpool Galaxy) Single exposure. Shot 7/7/16 ISO 6400 @ 60 seconds. Color saturation is enhanced, but hue unchanged.
NGC 7000 (North America Nebula) Single exposure. Shot 7/7/16 ISO 6400 @ 60 seconds. Color saturation is enhanced, but hue unchanged.
M20 (Trifid) and M8(Lagoon) Stack of 9 @ 240s @ ISO1600 shot 7/6/16, and stack of 9 @ 120s
@1600 shot 7/22/15. Color saturation enhanced, but hue unchanged. The pink parts of the
nebulae are emission nebulae. They fluoresce in the ultra violet light of their central
stars. The blue nebulae in the Trifid is a reflection nebula. It is reflecting white
light, and is blue because it's small particles reflect blue (short wavelengths) more
efficiently than the longer wavelengths. This is also why the sky is blue. The dark
veins in the Trifid are actually between us and the Trifid, and are a dark nebula
(Barnard 85).
E-mail and photos from Hilton on 03 July 2016
This is my first spotless photo. Solar viewing is a lot less interesting than last year. The attached PDF makes the spotlessness official.
The sun viewed in white light today. The bluish cast is from the filter.
The sun in Hydrogen Alpha red today. Lots less action than on previous photos.
I think lack of spots correlates to calmer space weather, less northern lights, and fewer problems for Canadian electrical grids.
Roice, regarding science camp:
As I said above, solar is likely underwhelming. Is there any interest?
Re. Astronomy: Twilight ends around 10:30. How does darkness correlate to your pupils' bedtimes?
Re. Telescopes: My refractor is a wide field scope, so it's good for large objects like big nebulae. (Nebulae are best viewed after the end of twilight.)
Ray's scope, with it's longer focal length, will do a much better job on star clusters like M13, which he showed us last week.
My big dob isn't an option because it needs a flat area about 12 feet in diameter to permit chair and step stool access to the eyepiece. It also has significant setup and tear down time if it travels, but if your schedule permits, I'd be happy to set up for your gang some evening at my place.
I assume we'll be hearing from you on the 6th or 7th?
--
Hilton Long PO Box 1518 Parowan, UT 84761